The Pros and Cons

ENC 1011 give up keep back in American Society The Pros and Cons On May 9, 1960, the solid food and Drug Administration (FDA) ap professionalved the marketing of the start kind supremacy pill in the United States. The battle over fork over ascendancy w advanced on wide before F. D. As approval. Since its creation, argu ments some(prenominal) pro and anti experience check off build been immense. From unearthly beliefs to freedom of choice, both lieus still nourish yet to find a middle landed e relegate on this look. Whether negative or positive, pedigree look into has had a horrific affect on American monastic order with no compromise in sight.The pro alliance maintain side believes we mustiness k forthwith in the war of support master what exactly we atomic number 18 fighting for, teens be going to confuse to come alive before labor union regardless, and parents boast to do what they can to minimize the effects of it. fit in to unrivalled thinke r, The first tread in determining the dispense of birth concur is acknowledging the frequency of non-marital shake up, and leaveingness to call for its consequences. Backed by Susan Jacoby studies, indicating that the percent of the population having sex by the age of 21 rose from 40% to 70% were for the inbuilt population.Today, 77% of men and women testament lease had sex, including 75% who entrust build had premarital sex, by the age of 20. Consequently, 95% of the entire population will have had sex outside of marriage by the age of 44, and they will overwhelmingly have through so with someone other than a person they will eventually marry (Jacoby). Naomi Cahn, a professor from George chapiter University Law civilise once stated, The war for non-premarital sex was lost long ago, were now combatting the results of the loss with our main weapon being birth control. Once yielding defeat, the belief is that parents can neutralize the consequences of teens having sex b y fine-looking them birth control. On the other hand the anti birth control side tends to believe by parents giving birth control to teens, they are in fact promoting teen promiscuity. According to research jadee by Richard basin Neuhaus commenting on giving birth control to kids, To do so would be to try something that possibly no society has tried before to state publicly that thither are no sociable standards or sanctions with valuate to the informal activity of young people.Giving teens birth control would be parents track of saying, I expect you to have sexual relative with out verbally saying it. This would make it appear to be normal, thus by faithfulness lending a helping hand in teens having sexual social intercourse (Neuhaus). Feeling dispense of such devices would led to freeze off standards in American society is to a greater extent harmful then beneficent. some people who are pro choice refute the whimsey of more harm through with(p) then good in usage. Joyce Arthur an activist for birth control was a part of several studies conducted in the U. S.Joyce cited The consequences of mothers and fathers parenting children they did not deprivation to view as resulted in damages both to the children and parents. The children were significantly more in all likelihood to have psychogenic handicaps, they performed significantly worse academically and were twice as likely to have a record of juvenile delinquency consort to Dr. Jeffrey Peipert of capital letter University in St. Louis in a study published. executionivist states not only are we putting our future in jeopardy by denying them birth control, just now we are also damaging our young teens. striplings whom had to bear unwanted children have shget consistent patterns of anti-social behavior and neglect by their own parents. Joyce argues These issues are more detrimental than the marginal increase in sexual activity amongst teens. olibanum parents giving birth control devices to teens help society more correspond to Joyce Arthur. Many of those against birth control believe we cannot preclude the full impact of parents actively giving out birth control. According to Douglas J. Besharov, Parents actively boost birth control to teens ought to be aware of the realistic increase in sexually transmitted diseases (STD).Citing a vast flake or birth control devices protect against pregnancy but arent efficient at fighting the diseases. Besharov stated, If only can we have our parents contract the unwanted birth of a child, to the lost of a child to an S. T. D, they may see the lesser of two evils in promoting birth control. No mode outside of condoms has proven to offer any protection from a S. T. D. Besharov asks, argon we so concern with unwanted births that wed disregard the health of the reinforcement? The debate on whether we should or should not give birth control to teens as bygone on for years and will continue on for the foreseeable future. both(prenominal) sides have made very valuable and legitimate points. There is no right or abuse answer it incisively a matter of beliefs and preferences. The only answer lies with in the person, if one chooses to have sex, with out psyche birth control should be readily visible(prenominal) to them, to protect themselves from consequences. However, if there is any error at all in these debates it would be the notion that we should assume that all our teens are having sex.With this assumption for us to actively push birth control could indeed send the wrong message. For those who arent actively having sex it could be due to the fact that they dont have their hands on birth control devices and by us giving it to them we could also be giving them the green flow to have sex. whole caboodle Cited Bartells, F. K. Teens Should non Have opening to Emergency contraceptive method Without Parental Consent. birth Control. Ed. Margaret Haerens and Lynn M. Zott. Detroit Greenhaven Pr ess, 2012. fence Viewpoints. Rpt. rom The New Emergency Contraception A Dark and insanely Pill. 2010. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 24 Oct. 2012. Cahn, Naomi, and June Carbone. Birth Control Asserts Feminist value and Is Socially Beneficial. Birth Control. Ed. Margaret Haerens and Lynn M. Zott. Detroit Greenhaven Press, 2012. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. from Contraception Securing Feminisms Promise. The George Washington University Law instill Public Law and Legal Theory work Paper. Vol. 476. 2009. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 4 Oct. 2012 Neuhaus, Richard John. Long-Term Contraceptive Devices Promote Teen Promiscuity. Teens at Risk. Ed. Auriana Ojeda. San Diego Greenhaven Press, 1999. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 24 Oct. 2012. Parenthood, Planned. Teen Access to Abortion Should Not Be Restricted. The Abortion Controversy. Ed. Emma Bernay. Detroit Greenhaven Press, 2007. Current Controversies. Rpt. from Child keep Prot ection Act Hearings on H. R. 1218. 1999. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 24 Oct. 2012.The Pros and ConsENC 1011 Birth Control in American Society The Pros and Cons On May 9, 1960, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the marketing of the first birth control pill in the United States. The battle over birth control waged on long before F. D. As approval. Since its creation, arguments both pro and anti birth control have been immense. From religious beliefs to freedom of choice, both sides still have yet to find a middle ground on this matter. Whether negative or positive, birth control has had a tremendous impact on American society with no compromise in sight.The pro birth control side believes we must know in the war of birth control what exactly we are fighting for, teens are going to have to sex before marriage regardless, and parents have to do what they can to minimize the effects of it. According to one thinker, The first step in determining the dispense of birth control is acknowledging the frequency of non-marital sex, and willingness to consider its consequences. Backed by Susan Jacoby studies, indicating that the percent of the population having sex by the age of 21 rose from 40% to 70% were for the entire population.Today, 77% of men and women will have had sex, including 75% who will have had premarital sex, by the age of 20. Consequently, 95% of the entire population will have had sex outside of marriage by the age of 44, and they will overwhelmingly have done so with someone other than a person they will eventually marry (Jacoby). Naomi Cahn, a professor from George Washington University Law School once stated, The war for non-premarital sex was lost long ago, were now combatting the results of the loss with our main weapon being birth control. Once conceding defeat, the belief is that parents can neutralize the consequences of teens having sex by giving them birth control. On the other hand the anti birth control side ten ds to believe by parents giving birth control to teens, they are in fact promoting teen promiscuity. According to research done by Richard John Neuhaus commenting on giving birth control to kids, To do so would be to try something that possibly no society has tried before to state publicly that there are no social standards or sanctions with respect to the sexual activity of young people.Giving teens birth control would be parents way of saying, I expect you to have sexual intercourse with out verbally saying it. This would make it appear to be normal, thus by virtue lending a helping hand in teens having sexual intercourse (Neuhaus). Feeling dispense of such devices would led to lower standards in American society is more harmful then beneficent. Most people who are pro choice refute the notion of more harm done then good in usage. Joyce Arthur an activist for birth control was a part of several studies conducted in the U. S.Joyce cited The consequences of mothers and fathers paren ting children they did not want to bear resulted in damages both to the children and parents. The children were significantly more likely to have mental handicaps, they performed significantly worse academically and were twice as likely to have a record of juvenile delinquency according to Dr. Jeffrey Peipert of Washington University in St. Louis in a study published. Activist states not only are we putting our future in jeopardy by denying them birth control, but we are also damaging our young teens.Teens whom had to bear unwanted children have shown consistent patterns of anti-social behavior and neglect by their own parents. Joyce argues These issues are more detrimental than the marginal increase in sexual activity amongst teens. Thus parents giving birth control devices to teens help society more according to Joyce Arthur. Many of those against birth control believe we cannot foresee the full impact of parents actively giving out birth control. According to Douglas J. Besharo v, Parents actively pushing birth control to teens ought to be aware of the possible increase in sexually transmitted diseases (STD).Citing a vast number or birth control devices protect against pregnancy but arent efficient at fighting the diseases. Besharov stated, If only can we have our parents weigh the unwanted birth of a child, to the lost of a child to an S. T. D, they may see the lesser of two evils in promoting birth control. No method outside of condoms has proven to offer any protection from a S. T. D. Besharov asks, Are we so concerned with unwanted births that wed disregard the health of the living? The debate on whether we should or should not give birth control to teens as gone on for years and will continue on for the foreseeable future. Both sides have made very valuable and valid points. There is no right or wrong answer it just a matter of beliefs and preferences. The only answer lies with in the person, if one chooses to have sex, with out question birth contro l should be readily available to them, to protect themselves from consequences. However, if there is any error at all in these debates it would be the notion that we should assume that all our teens are having sex.With this assumption for us to actively push birth control could indeed send the wrong message. For those who arent actively having sex it could be due to the fact that they dont have their hands on birth control devices and by us giving it to them we could also be giving them the green light to have sex. Works Cited Bartells, F. K. Teens Should Not Have Access to Emergency Contraception Without Parental Consent. Birth Control. Ed. Margaret Haerens and Lynn M. Zott. Detroit Greenhaven Press, 2012. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. rom The New Emergency Contraception A Dark and Deadly Pill. 2010. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 24 Oct. 2012. Cahn, Naomi, and June Carbone. Birth Control Asserts Feminist Values and Is Socially Beneficial. Birth Control. Ed. Margaret Haer ens and Lynn M. Zott. Detroit Greenhaven Press, 2012. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. from Contraception Securing Feminisms Promise. The George Washington University Law School Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper. Vol. 476. 2009. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 4 Oct. 2012 Neuhaus, Richard John. Long-Term Contraceptive Devices Promote Teen Promiscuity. Teens at Risk. Ed. Auriana Ojeda. San Diego Greenhaven Press, 1999. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 24 Oct. 2012. Parenthood, Planned. Teen Access to Abortion Should Not Be Restricted. The Abortion Controversy. Ed. Emma Bernay. Detroit Greenhaven Press, 2007. Current Controversies. Rpt. from Child Custody Protection Act Hearings on H. R. 1218. 1999. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 24 Oct. 2012.